Difference between Accuracy and Resolution: Understand these Metrology Terminologies
Metrology performed correctly depends vastly on the correct terminology,
as it is critical to get the needed information on measurements. We decided to
go through the definition and showcase real-life examples of some sensors’
capabilities in regards to accuracy, resolution, precision,
The definition of Accuracy and Resolution
In general most instrument manufacturers will specify and define the
accuracy, precision, resolution and sensitivity of their systems. Unfortunately,
these specifications aren’t always aligned with one another or even presented
within the same terminology. There are usually no instructions on how to read,
understand these, or even the thinking process behind the measurement terminology the
individual company may have used (many of the definitions are presented as the
worst-case values whereas some others take into consideration the actual
When it comes to sensors especially, accuracy and
resolution are the two definitions that are often a source of
confusion. Sometimes these are even used interchangeably.
To define simply;
Accuracy is the sensor’s or instrument’s degree of
veracity – how close a measurement gets to the actual or known value. To
check the accuracy means to check how close a reported measurement is to the
Sensor Resolution meaning on the other hand is The smallest
distinguishable change the sensor can detect and display. The higher the
resolution (thus, the smaller the distinguishable and displayable change) –
the more specific are the values.
General Principles of Accuracy
Especially with the increasing popularization of IoT and IIoT into the everyday, and industrial
trends – the accurate calibration of sensors is already a
safety-critical matter. There could be much more distrust towards a self-driven
car, a smart home or a surgical precision robot, if miscalibration rates and
volumes would be widely known (this is not about accuracy error, because as we
learned above, a sensor is initially true if its bias is is less than the
According to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO,
specifically the ISO 5721), the general term “accuracy” is used to describe
the trueness and precision. Trueness is the closeness of agreement between the
average value obtained from a large series of test results and an accepted
reference value (important to note that the trueness is usually showcased with
the difference between the expectation of the test results and an accepted
reference value, also known as bias); while precision is the closeness of
agreement between independent test results gathered under previously agreed
To help understand the above-mentioned, take a look at the diagram below
B. Accurate and precise
C. Neither Accurate Nor Precise
What we can observe here is an increasing precision from C to A; from the
middle of the dart to the precisely spread dots on point D is the distance that
can be classified as “bias”; while the distance alongside the accurate and
precise dots, on the point B can be described as “precision error”.
Initial accuracy:when after calibration, a sensor has a
bias that is less than the precision error – the sensor can be considered
The precision error of an accurate sensor only sounds foreign, however, it is
more common than you may think. An everyday use digital kitchen scale may have
an accuracy error of <±0.1% of 10kg, which means that if we apply exactly
4000kg weight, the display will read 3990kg.
Another good example is calibration of automotive , medical, industrial specialized
equipment and other sensors that will demand higher accuracy than usual.
A reading of 100.0 V on a Deflection MultiMeter (DMM) may
range from 98.0 V to 102.0 V, (the accuracy being ±2%). Might be obvious,
but on sensitive electronic equipment or in safety critical environments as
such – accuracy is of utmost importance.
Global perception gap for the most accurate sensors:
So what are the standard requirements towards accuracy and resolution? Do the
expectations of the market and the provided minimum standards by various
entities such as ASTM, IEC, ISO (as well as governmental preferences in between
these or other entities) match, especially in the standard
There is an obvious gap between understanding the fundamentals of accuracy
and resolution as such. There are various requirements from international
above-mentioned of what should the sensor accuracy be (this could also be
described as, how inaccurate is a sensor allowed to be). Based on this there are
also requirements on how to use these – i. e. in terms of some temperature
sensors, to ensure certain accuracy or tolerance, there is a certain minimum of
needed . The gap in question appears clearly when some companies request to
meet these standards of minimum wired connection, even in the case of a wireless
sensor without realizing the specificity of the question.
Some especially curious, while reading through the “General Principles of
Accuracy” part of this article might have asked questions along the lines of
“what is considered the “accepted reference value” or what are those
“previously agreed conditions” that define the trueness of a sensor?, or
what if there is a sensor that has more “trueness” than the previously
agreed conditions are?”. These questions might seem irrelevant, only until
someone actually does invent a system with higher or similar accuracy as the
most accurate, previously agreed value is.
We at RVmagnetics, for example, have developed proximity sensors that detect
temperature, pressure, and the magnetic field directly. Our technology is quite unique. The
sensor itself is a passive lament and i thin like human hair, the sensing head
as well can be extremely miniaturized: some features include the permeability of
our sensor of ~ 1 (like vacuum), or the sensor saturation
field of cca. 3 Oe, in other words, it as a pretty unique technology.
We have managed to ensure the temperature accuracy of
0.01°C, proven this achievement through various tests, our clients are
excited, the measurements are as satisfactory as demanded.
However, to prove the accuracy level based on certain internationally defined
standards, it is needed to take into account the “previously agreed
condition”. In our case, if we take into account the PT100 chart, to proof our
sensors accuracy of 0.01 C, it has to be compared with another sensor or a
system, that has more accuracy than 0.01 C, which, at the moment is an
impossible task (there are PT100 sensors with the same accuracy level, but not
ones with a higher level of accuracy).
This is not to blame an industry player in need of accurate measurements of
course, as all they want is to meet, i. e. the PT100 requirements, and not
proving the 0.01 C accuracy may be a red flag for them, moving the negotiations
into a closed circle. To overcome similar issues we chose the way of raising
awareness about the definitions and specific characteristics involved in
the calibration and metrology industry as such.
The definition of Resolution for sensors
The resolution of a sensor is to be defined in quite a different
category and context. As mentioned above, the resolution is the smallest
possible distinguishable metric change that a sensor can detect.
However, it is important to realize that most sensors provide analog data (in
theory an analog output would have limitless resolution), and the displayed,
converted output into digital data is what we can classify as resolution.
Of course, there is a reason why accuracy and
resolution are misused and even mistakenly used interchangeably. One of the
main ones being that the resolution relates to accuracy. A good example of the
relationship of accuracy and resolution would be the following: To measure
1 colt within ±0.015% resolution requires a 6-digate instrument that is able
to process such data (namely displaying 5 decimal places(x,12345)). The fifth
decimal place represents 10 microvolts, thus the device has a resolution of
Imagine a simple test of a 1.5 V household battery. If a digital multimeter
has a resolution of 1 mV on the 3 V range, it is possible to see a change of
1 mV while reading the voltage. The user could see changes as small as one
one-thousandth of a volt, or 0.001 at the 3 V range. Resolution may be listed
in a meter's specifications as maximum resolution, which is the smallest
value that can be discerned on the meter's lowest range setting (the best
example for this would be an image resolution: the smaller pixel, the higher
Resolution is improved by reducing the digital multimeter's range setting as
long as the measurement is within the set range. With this in mind, a critical
procedure,like the monitoring of a Printed Circuit Board (PCB), requires
a higher resolution than usual.
A sensor with a low or lower resolution will only detect and register a
change or shift in whole centimeters, for example. When a sensor with a higher
resolution is used, it is possible to do the same task displaying
This comes to show, that even if sensor Accuracy is a much more fundamentally
important indicator for the sensor in question, it has to be perfectly
calibrated (which isn’t always possible to keep up for the end user of i. e.
electric vehicles ) – the resolution of that sensors data is what
displays it’s capacity in the best possible way, thus what directly affects
the decision making processes in the moment.
Conclusion: What is the Difference between Accuracy and Resolution?
So the conclusion is that accuracy and resolution are representatives of
different domains – Resolution displays the smallest unit
that the sensor/tool reading can be broken down to without any instability in
the signal; whereas Accuracy is the closeness of the
tool’s/sensor’s measurement to the “true” value of a measured
With a B2B sales & marketing background in INGO & Foreign Investments in government sectors, Tigran is now responsible for extensive industry research in RVmagnetics focused on marketing the company both in R&D and Business spaces. Tigran is up to date with trends in deep tech, sensors, and innovative startups in need of niche growth. He shares the knowledge with RVmagnetics communities via blogs, publications, and news releases, while also using his experience to Manage RVmagnetics' Key Partners' accounts.